The Economics of Crime or the Economics of Labor (or Lions!)

Is it a crime? Should it be?

The world has become a lot more affluent over our lifetime. Heck, India has 750,000  millionaires (Dollar millionaires, not rupee millionaires). No matter how you look at it, the stakeholders  of large corporations are  well-off, thank you.  Even if they lose 80% of their annual  income , they will still be very well off indeed. This was not the case at any time in history.

 So we need to redefine criminal activity for the 21st century.

In the movie “Greed”, the obnoxious super-rich textile tycoon gets fatally mauled by a lion he rented for his own  birthday festivities. Well , the mauling episode was facilitated by an young woman employee who “accidentally” pressed the button to open the cage door. It was also witnessed by a resident journalist who was so ” horrified” that he did not call for help ,  nor report the incident to the cops later.

Are these two people guilty of murder of a horrible human being? The answer is yes!

Since the Roman times where angry and hungry lions were released to prey on slaves for the enjoyment of the spectators,   every  society frowns on  unleashing lions to prey on human beings, no matter how despicable the human being may be.  Further , such acts are considered as heinous as first –degree murder and punishable as such.

Consider now a different act.  You force  a family of three (includes a small child) to live in a small windowless, stuffy room. They can only go outside  for twelve   hours of backbreaking manual labor every day. You make them eat small, inadequate portions of  rice or bread and some basic veggies.  The child gets sick but you forbid the parents to seek medical care –she eventually dies. The parents survive ten of fifteen years of your  torture and succumb to some common disease because they are very weak.

Are you guilty of murder or abetment to murder?  If you do this in USA or in Europe, then you will be guilty of forced  labor, torture, imprisonment,   child endangerment and a whole bunch of other crimes besides accessory to murder, and will be punished accordingly.

Then why would a multi-national corporation be allowed to pay wages that force people to live like the family described above? Oh yes, to maximize corporate profits! To keep the price of designer jeans and shoes competitive!

F**k that!

 I would apply the same criterion as in advanced countries and declare these wages “criminal” wages.

How much wage is considered non-criminal? Well, I have an Econ Ph.D. , so do a lot of others, we  will gladly calculate the minimum non-criminal  wage for every country and share the information with others.

It is time to change the laws!

The fact that in poor countries employers pay low wages to local workers , does not matter in the 21st century! There are Masai tribes in Kenya who willingly live in areas infested by  lions and sometimes get mauled by them, yet releasing a lion to maul humans in a developed society remains a capital offense.

What about labor economics 101 – one uniform wage in a competitive labor market! Well, violating  that for a rise in social welfare is not such a big deal. Will this have a serious effect on indigenous enterprises? Since the number of  multi-national factories is still relatively small in each Asian or African country, having a dual wage rate is not going to be  seriously disruptive.

 Yes it will increase the price of consumer goods in the Western societies by about 20 to 25% at the most, but  it is a small price to pay to stop people from being murdered, isn’t it?

 If anything, it will also shame some new millionaires in India into paying a non-criminal wage to their employees!!

Corrupt societies: Different Paradigms: Central Asia

There are countries that are seriously corrupt, but the way corruption works is substantially different in different societies. I have first hand experience of North America, the Indian subcontinent , Cambodia, and Central Asia. There is also corruption in other countries of the world, but I will not directly discuss them

I will only write about what I have seen and what I think.

Academic research on corruption is misleading, inadequate and unreliable. So don’t pay attention to those corruption indices and corruption experiments.

Let’s start with Central Asian Countries, which were all part of Soviet Russia, controlled by the big Brother in Moscow for eighty years or so. Several things made the Soviet countries dysfunctional.

Equality , not attainable in a truly capitalistic economy, was pervasive, but it totally destroyed any incentive to work hard. If the man who swept the streets got paid 50 dollars a month , the manager of a major state enterprise (comparable to the CEO of a large company in the West) would get paid about 500 dollars a month, not 500,000 every month! Everyone had pretty much the same lifestyle . The major output in factories and offices was gossip.

The government was highly politicalized but clueless about Economics 101 (not kidding). Useless investments sprouted up everywhere, highly profitable projects were canceled at the whim of the party leaders, there were hardly any proper accounting of revenue and expenditure – and the government owned everything that needed proper accounting!! A lot has been written about this elsewhere!!

Come 1991, and there was independence of the “Stans” in Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan,Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan -not a “stan” but very similar) . Along with political instability, there was anarchy during the first few years. Some individuals expropriated a lot of assets – both assets belonging to the state and assets belonging to other private citizens. . Around the middle to end of 90’s the government struck a truce with these criminals and restored order in day to day lives of the citizens. (There are six “Stans” – so the exact sequence of events will, of course, differ among them)

And a Network society was born. Who is in the Network? Top government officials, their families and a handful of ex-criminal families. They control all major capitalistic activities, and they appropriate most of the surplus. Any new capitalist venture, once it reaches a noticeable size, will have to be compromised with the Network or will be destroyed. The common people run kiosks and small markets and ply taxis and own small restaurants. Kazakhstan has been fortunate enough to discover a lot of oil. Alas, the ownership of oil , property of the Kazakh people, has been transferred to a handful of private companies , who appropriate most of the oil money.

Hundreds of millions of dollars in oil money , and profits from other enterprises are appropriated by a few families and their lackeys every year. Much of the money is sent abroad to secret bank accounts or is used to buy foreign assets.

How long will this bleeding go on? My guess is at least for the next fifty years, until and unless this regime falls apart and replaced by more democratic institutions .

The post -Soviet regime has been manna from heaven to the Network, but for the common people, things have not changed much. Their average income is still abysmally low- a college graduate may start working at $200 a month- but there are certain redeeming features of the post-Soviet capitalist regimes:

People can buy, sell, own and rent real estate- not possible during the Soviet regime- and improve their financial condition this way – once their net worth reaches a million dollars, the Network may take notice, but otherwise they are left alone!

Thanks to modern technology, they can invest in stocks, bonds or foreign exchange , all over the world. Financial capital is usually anonymous, and hence under the radar!

People can own and run small businesses which can be quite profitable, as long as they stay under the radar!

People can and do go abroad for work or even migrate to other countries. One outstanding legacy of the Soviet regime is an excellent secondary education system everywhere in the country, even in remote villages. Anyone with a working knowledge of English or Arabic and a college degree is usually more skilled and productive than an average college graduate in the West

Opportunities also exist to excel in Sports or entertainment or arts or IT – success in any of these fields can be very lucrative. And finally, sometimes the Network notices you and decides to use your services, which will change your life forever.

So, an utterly despotic regime bleeds the country year after year, while the people suffer silently , hoping for better times. The people have been subdued and terrorized enough, so there are very few instances of organized protest. Like children in a family of a brutally violent and abusive father, they are well-behaved and (at least in public) full of praise for their parents.

I worked in Almaty, Kazakhstan for five years – met a lot of students and colleagues and local people whose memory I will cherish for the rest of my life!!

The other “stans” have regimes that are very similar, except Uzbeks and Tajiks do not have oil , Kyrgyzstan has more democratic institutions, Azerbaijan is like Kazakhstan except it is a lot smaller, and Turkmenistan has oil but an extremely paranoid, schizoid government ! I was fortunate enough to have students from all these countries in Almaty !

The following pic is from my last Industrial Organization class from Spring 2019

A bizarre consequence of this regime is a few hundred high-end retail “ghost” stores in Almaty. The stores sell a pair of gloves for $400, bed sheets for $200, and winter jackets for $ 800 in a country where the average worker makes about 200 per month! They are usually staffed by well-dressed young women (many of them very attractive), and they get zero customers everyday of the month. Obviously they are tax ploys for changing the color of money! I leave you with a few pics of empty stores – they look like this everyday, all day!!